{"id":27000,"date":"2017-01-05T11:46:21","date_gmt":"2017-01-05T11:46:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yaabot.com\/?p=27000"},"modified":"2024-01-17T18:52:29","modified_gmt":"2024-01-17T13:22:29","slug":"noobs-guide-antimatter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/entropymag.co\/noobs-guide-antimatter\/","title":{"rendered":"A Noob’s Guide To Antimatter"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Universe was once, what you could call, a frothing cauldron. Unexpectedly, the Big Bang ensued. While we don’t know for sure how it occurred, the universe burst into an existence made of matter. Some of the ingredients include sub-atomic particles. Such as electrons, protons, mesons etc. Every part of the observable universe, according to scientists, consists of matter (and energy, of course). But is there a part of this expansive canvass that is not matter in nature? Science aficionados seem to give a vigorous nod for this hypothetical \u2018underworld’. These mysterious particles, collectively called ‘antimatter’, have been puzzling scientists in a decades-long game of hide-and-seek.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As the term implies, antimatter is the polar opposite of ordinary matter that encompasses us. It\u00a0retains the fundamental features – that of mass and charge, except for sign\/polarity. In other words, the mass remains the same for both particles, but the sign of the charge and spin of an\u00a0antiparticle is reversed. In light of this, all particles have a divergent yet identical twin. Thus, the antimatter equivalent of an electron is\u00a0a positron (an electron carrying a positive charge). We represent any constituent of antimatter by a bar atop its corresponding matter symbol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Easily one of the most mindboggling discoveries of the 20th century, antimatter was the brainchild of British physicist Paul Dirac. Dirac set out to formulate an equation linking visibly disparate laws of quantum theory and Einstein\u2019s special theory of relativity. He found that his equation yielded the same result for electrons with positive charge as with negative charge. This led him to postulate that if there is an electron with a negative charge, then, there must exist an electron with positive charge. He argued that this was similar to the confluence of protons, neutrons and electrons to form atoms and matter. Their corresponding antiparticles would combine to form antiatoms and antimatter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What sets apart antimatter in the innumerable blind spots in science are the speculations surrounding its absence. Unlike other discoveries, scientists haven’t scuttled from shaky ground due to the enigma that surrounds it. Matter & antimatter, being polar opposites, annihilate each other in a spectacular release of energy when they come in contact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After the Big Bang, matter and antimatter are thought to have interacted and fiercely annihilated each other, leaving behind a universe dominated by matter. Annihilation of both particles only confirms that matter and antimatter is of the same constituents. By annihilation, we don’t mean that the particles vanish into thin air; They end up emitting gamma rays (\u03b3), high-energy electromagnetic radiations. This process is called Baryogenesis<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The perennial unsolved mystery in science is that if antimatter and matter were present in equal quantities, why did only\u00a0matter pervade the universe? Had they\u00a0annihilated each other completely, in principle, the universe as we know it wouldn’t exist. If you’ll look around, you’ll notice this isn’t the case. Physicists have hypothesized the presence of one extra matter particle for every matter-anti matter pair, effectively tipping the balance. Simply put, a slight excess of matter could be behind\u00a0this apparent imbalance in the ratio. Yet, scientists haven\u2019t zeroed in on the exact mechanism that underlies this asymmetry. Research to explain this asymmetry is afoot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So we know there’s a spectacular release of energy that ensues when the two interact. No surprises then, that there’s been\u00a0increasing interest geared more towards adding anti matter\u00a0to\u00a0our military\u00a0arsenal. A\u00a0gram\u00a0is capable of producing an explosion equivalent to 3 atomic bombs dropped at Hiroshima. However, physicists have managed only to recreate an infinitesimal amount of anti matter<\/a>. Funnily enough, if all the anti-matter ever made by human beings were\u00a0to be annihilated, the energy yield\u00a0would be extremely insignificant. Only enough\u00a0power a light bulb for a few minutes, a team of scientists at CERN has explained<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Antimatter could also work as a\u00a0potential alternative to spacecraft fuel<\/a>. You’d\u00a0require only a tiny amount to achieve viable\u00a0propulsion. But the possibilities are stunted by an\u00a0acute shortage of anti matter available. In medicine, positrons work as a stable apparatus for PET scans. On the other hand antiprotons seem to\u00a0possess some potential in\u00a0treating and curing cancer and brain tumours.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Also Read:<\/strong> Higgs Boson: The God Particle Explained<\/a><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\nModern day usage<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Current Antimatter Production<\/h2>\n\n\n\n